Egnor and natural selection
Neurosurgeon and recent addition to the Discovery Institute's Media Complaints Division blog Dr. Michael Egnor is at it again. He's [responded](http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/evolutionary_biology_and_evolu.html) to Burt's [latest response](http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/03/hey_dr_egnor_at_least.html) to [his prior response](http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/dr_humburg_sets_me_and_galen_s.html) to Burt's [earlier response](/archives/2007/03/egnorance-combo-arrogance.html) to [his -](http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/why_would_i_want_my_doctor_to.html) you get the drift. Burt's been doing a great job of responding to Egnor, and I don't want to step on his toes, but Egnor says a couple of things this time that I think would benefit from the perspective of someone who is studying evolutionary biology.
First, though, I'd like to address this delightful bit of less-than-honest rhetoric: